@abobla@lemm.ee to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agopro tiplemm.eeimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagepro tiplemm.ee@abobla@lemm.ee to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-square@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish0•3 months agoalso set up insults in sudoers for a unique experience
minus-square@Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•edit-23 months agoAlias albert=apt please albert-get update Edit: oops sorry didn’t mean to reply to your comment, I’m on mobile so I thought was new comment
minus-square@MonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilink0•3 months agoThat’s please albert update nowadays. Why is apt-get still around?
minus-squareKnoLordlinkfedilink0•3 months agoapt on its own isn’t safe to use in shell scripts while apt-get is. At least, that is the output I get when using apt in a script on Debian. That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use apt, for automated scripts apt-get.
also set up
insults
in sudoers for a unique experienceAlias albert=apt
please albert-get update
Edit: oops sorry didn’t mean to reply to your comment, I’m on mobile so I thought was new comment
That’s
please albert update
nowadays.Why is apt-get still around?
apt
on its own isn’t safe to use in shell scripts whileapt-get
is. At least, that is the output I get when usingapt
in a script on Debian.That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use
apt
, for automated scriptsapt-get
.How dare you. Straight to Lemmy jail!