• @FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Oh, there are tons of distros where you don’t need to use the terminal for anything, even Manjaro, an arch based distro, doesn’t need you to ever open the terminal. I was just saying that if adoption is the goal then using the terminal can’t be a requirement for a normal user experience.

    • @Titou@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Wrong example, Manjaro is probably the less stables distro i’ve tried, and thoses issues seems to be common when you look at the forum

      • @FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        What I mean is that using the terminal isn’t mandatory in Manjaro while Arch and Arch based distros all require it. So for that it’s an excellent example.

        As for stability it’s a bit more stable than Arch itself from my experience but I still has issues. The most stable distro I have used was Pop OS, I didn’t have a single issue there for like 3 years straight, I only switched because of a hardware change and Pop OS’s Mesa version was unstable on the new hardware.

        My central point is still that you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

        • @Titou@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

          We used to back in the 20th century, when computer didn’t had GUI

            • @Titou@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Yep as you said not everybody is made to use a computer, but everybody can learn how to with a minimum of will

                • @Titou@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Im just saying everybody can learn basic terminal commands, because on Linux you’re on your own