• @dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People like you or I may know what we’re doing with a rooted device, but I think the issue for the banks is that they can’t guarantee that someone with a rooted phone knows what they’re doing or isn’t using a malicious app, so they have to be cautious and block all rooted phones.

    An app that requires root may look like a normal app but it could be a trojan that modifies banking apps in the background (eg patches them in RAM so transfers done through the app go to a different recipient). There’s been malicious apps in the Play Store in the past, and rooted apps have way less oversight - some are literally just APK files attached to XDA-Developers posts or random blog sites.

    • I take your point, and I’m sure you’re right about the banks’ rationale, but in my own view it does not seem like it should be the banks’ decision to make.

      • @qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        As soon as a bank offers any sort of fraud protection, though, security becomes a bank issue (in addition to a “you” issue).

        Not at all saying I agree with the banks on this, but I think that may be part of the thinking.

        • @dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          This is a good point. The bank needs to do as much as they can to reduce fraud risk, and they’ve probably found some correlation between rooted phones and a higher likelihood of fraudulent transactions. Some banks block VPNs for a similar reason - when logging in from a VPN, it’s harder for them to tell that it’s actually you vs if it’s an attacker that uses the same VPN service as you.

    • sepi
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      bro I gave my nana root on her eye phone and by the end of the week she had hacked half of North Korea - the other half thought her actions were a good example of juche ideals. It was crazy ngl