@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 month agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 month agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square@heavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•1 month agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-square@peoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 month agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanaellinkfedilink0•1 month agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-square@maiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilink0•edit-21 month agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 month agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.