@cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoThe code was very janky, but it workedi.imgflip.comimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageThe code was very janky, but it workedi.imgflip.com@cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-square@carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoNot a JS dev either but ===. Not really sure what the (+x) is about
minus-square@FiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilink0•1 year agothe remainder operator should return a number or a NaN right? do we actually need the triple here?
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•edit-21 year agoNot really. But with JS it’s better safe than sorry. The GP’s addition is unnecessary, but I fully support anyone that decides to do it.
Not a JS dev either but
===.Not really sure what the
(+x)is aboutthe remainder operator should return a number or a NaN right? do we actually need the triple here?
Not really. But with JS it’s better safe than sorry.
The GP’s addition is unnecessary, but I fully support anyone that decides to do it.
point taken!