I’m trying out Obsidian for taking notes, and this made me laugh.

      • @Troz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        I made that switch a few months ago just so I could cut, copy and paste without having to lookup how to do it. it’s been great.

      • bioemerl
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Vim really is an IDE, not a text editor. It’s usable as an editor but overkill.

        Nano serves a difference purpose. It’s like telling someone on a bike that a mustang is better.

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          Vim is absolutely not an IDE. It has no integrations with any language. It’s just a powerful text editor. You can add language plugins and configure it to be an IDE.

          • Bo7a
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            No offense intended here - But why is this being upvoted?

            vim absolutely is an IDE if that is how you want to use it. Syntax highlighting, linter, language specific autocomplete, integrated sed/regex. And much, much more.

            • Kogasa
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              Syntax highlighting, linting, and language specific autocomplete are features supported by plugins and scripts. Plain, simple vim is a powerful extensible text editor. The extensibility makes it easy to turn into an IDE.

                • Kogasa
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  Yeah, there is a generic syntax highlighting scheme. I had forgotten because it’s not very good for some languages, I’d replaced it with a LSP-based implementation years ago.

    • @marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I like nano because it has worked any time I needed it. I don’t dislike nano because I’m not good enough at Linux to have ever run into its limitations