• @BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I’m on KDE Arch and switched about a week ago. I have an Nvidia card and went straight from x11 to Wayland plasma 6. It’s definitely prettier and smoother, but it’s absolutely not as stable. Idk if that’s an Nvidia things, a Wayland thing, or a plasma 6 thing, but I definitely have fairly consistent display issues after switching. I have a btrfs snapshot from right before I updated that’s at plasma 5, so I have a fallback if I want it. It’s mostly just an inconvenience right now, so I’ll probably just ride it out for a while and see if things improve.

    • @tron@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      It’s definitely Wayland on Nvidia, I had the same issues, Element had a flickering black screen. Switching the default session from Wayland to X11 fixed all issues.

      • @loafty_loafey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        From my experience it happens with any XWayland window that fails to hit your display refresh rate. Makes programs such as vscode or element almost impossible to use on high Hz screens, as their max fps is locked to 60.

  • @VARXBLE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Made the switch on EndeavourOS this morning and so far so good. I was hesitant to update to Wayland because I’m still a newb and heard there were issues, but my system is AMD based so no problems (yet).

    I like it

    • @lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I think most people complaining about Wayland nowadays are just Nvidia users. I don’t have any problems with it on my AMD GPU.

    • @Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      My biggest issue with wayland was screensharing on Discord, but plasma 6 fixed that with xwaylandvideobridge

      I’ve been using Wayland as a daily driver for a few years now, and I’d say it’s ready for 98% of use cases

  • I'm back on my BS 🤪
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    I’m on KDE Neon, and the update jacked up the desktop, icons, kvantium, and dolphin configuration of one user account. If I use Wayland on the account that is fine, the keyboard and mouse start acting annoyingly funky. Also, it completely changed my login screen.

    • @KISSmyOS@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Arch is the least buggy distro I ever tried.

      Except for Slackware maybe. Slackware has literally no bugs. If it doesn’t behave like it should, it’s your fault.

      • @Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        I broke my install by updating it, I get that if you perfectly understand what’s going on then it has no bugs but that’s really not my experience. A lot of the time something will break and it’s easy to say “I should’ve known it was this so it’s my fault” but really if you didn’t expect it to work a certain way and it breaks it’s not a super stable system.

        • @KISSmyOS@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          My Ubuntu broke literally every time I did a version upgrade. It’s probably better now, but I’m not going back.
          The last system that straight up broke for me was a default installation of Debian Stable, and that wasn’t long ago.

          I understand Arch isn’t easy to use or maintain.
          But in my opinion, if you use something wrong and it breaks, that doesn’t mean it’s unstable. And if you update Arch by simply hitting “pacman -Syu” every day, you’re doing it wrong.

          • @Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            But if lots of people use it wrong and break it then maybe it’s too obtuse. I broke one of my applications by upgrading packages. The solution? Install the package again, I thought the package manager would take care of stuff like that but if it’s meant to be me then I think it’s a bad system.

            • @KISSmyOS@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              I always find it kinda weird when people criticize free software.
              Like, the developers make something, give it to you for free, pay for server space so you can download it for free, and then you say “it sucks”.
              OK, just don’t use it then.

              • @Darthjaffacake@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Criticism and hate are two different things. I hate windows, I can criticise parts of arch Linux which is so far my favourite OS. Me not liking part of it or the way it works doesn’t mean there’s another version that is completely perfect and I should just shut up and use that. Also no it doesn’t suck, but updating my system and having it break is a problem I should not be having.

      • @tty5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Same. I’ve switched to Arch from Ubuntu as my main os almost 10 years ago and in all that time I’ve had a problem that goes beyond inconvenience level maybe twice. In fact Ubuntu broke more often.

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Why would I want Plasma 6 on a stable release. That’s not why people use Debian

    • @BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Yeah, this kind of misunderstands what debian is. If you wanted newer bleeding edge stuff you wouldn’t be using debian. Debian is all about the stability.

      That said, Debian Sid or testing (the bleeding edge system that 13 will come from) may move to 6? Debian 12 was last year so 13 would be in 2025, so it seems likely 6 will make its way into the bleeding edge versions if people really wanted to use it. But there are better options for most end users than using test versions of major distros.

      • @bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Debian is not all about “stability” in the sense of “doesn’t crash”. Debian is all about consistency. The platform doesn’t change. That means if there is a bug that crashes the system for you… it’s going to consistently be there.

        For me, it was when stable was on kernel 3.16, and 3.18 was in testing, but the latest kernel was 3.19. And this was an era where AMD’s drivers not fully OpenGL compliant yet. Which meant games would crash. And knowing “this game will always crash until 3 years from now when we finally get a newer kernel” was enough to chase me off.

        debian’s neovim package is 0.7.2. Sid is 0.7.2. Experimental is 0.9.5… If there are any bugfixes between 0.7.2 and 0.9.5 that are critical for your workflow… too bad. If its not a “security” release, its not getting updated. You can live with knowing the bug.

        “Never change anything, stick to known good versions” only works if you know 100% that the “known good version” is actually bug free. No code is bug free, so inevitably the locked down versions in Debian will have still some flaws (and debian doesn’t backport bugfixes, they only backport SECURITY fixes). For most use cases, the flaws will be minor enough to not matter. But inevitably, if a flaw exists, it affects SOMEONE.

        If you actually want to do any sort of complicated computing, debian is not a great choice. if you want a unchanging base so you can run a web browser and processor, I’m sure it’s great.

        • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Debian is not all about “stability” in the sense of “doesn’t crash”. Debian is all about consistency. The platform doesn’t change.

          Yes, that’s what ‘stable’ means.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        If you want cutting edge you should use Fedora. Debian does have a unstable branch but it isn’t really tested

        • @zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thats seriously overstating things. I’ve been running testing or sid for years and years, and I can only remember a handful of times where anything meaningfully broke. And typically its dependency breakages, not actual software breakages.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Testing is different from unstable. Testing should be fairly stable but it is missing security support so keep that in mind.

            • @zaphod@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes I’m aware of the security tradeoffs with testing, which is why I’ve started refraining from mentioning it as an option as pedants like to pop out of the woodwork and mention this exact issue every damn time.

              Also, testing absolutely gets “security support”, the issue is that security fixes don’t land in testing immediately and so there can be some delay. As per the FAQ:

              Security for testing benefits from the security efforts of the entire project for unstable. However, there is a minimum two-day migration delay, and sometimes security fixes can be held up by transitions. The Security Team helps to move along those transitions holding back important security uploads, but this is not always possible and delays may occur.

    • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      If system-breaking updates ship to consumers, the QA system doesn’t work.

      openSUSE TW is rolling release and their openQA system is extremely robust.

      • @iarigby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        can’t understand how manjaro is still alive, given how much better endeavouros configures the system

        • CubitOom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I haven’t tried endeavor is yet. In what ways is it better than Manjaro?

          • @iarigby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            in my experience manjaro install had a weird unnecessary customizations in terms of configuring things. Applications broke more often and it was harder to apply common fixes. Not very beginner-friendly because of that. Endeavor results in a much cleaner and simpler install

        • dave@hal9000
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          My experience since I began using Linux full time for my main desktop, chronologically: Manjaro, Kubuntu, Debian stable, Debian testing, endeavourOS. Started EOS a week ago and I was shocked by how well everything worked out of the box. A bunch of things I had to tweak and fix before, like messing with NVIDIA drivers among other things, just worked perfectly out of the box. I tried it on a lark after borking something on my Debian system, kinda reluctantly since I had already made a massive script for customizing my Debian based KDE installs, but in the end I didn’t even feel like I needed it because it all just worked fine without all my scripted workarounds for everything. Really impressed. I just got the plasma 6 update a couple of hours ago and it’s mostly fine, dealing with a couple of issues before deciding whether I hit that timeshift restore and wait some more

        • @devilish666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Maybe because many website still give recommendations who newbie in arch or Linux distro
          Don’t believe it ?? Try googling it

  • @kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    In a way, Squidward is really like Debian, if those two are Arch and NixOS. And as I grow older, I can relate to Squidward more and more…

  • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I’m feeling this. My day today was roont by plasma 6. I still can’t unlock any LUKS usb drives with dolphin.