- cross-posted to:
- programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
I, too, place
/dev/nullafter every lineYes, but
2>&1 > /dev/nullis the real hero.No,
/dev/null 2>&1is. If try your example but with file instead null, stderr content not in file.Because x>y not redirect x to y, but duplicate y and set x to y-duplicate. See bash manpage REDIRECTION (your example in that section for what not work).
As i understand, your example set 2 to what 1 is, then set 1 to null. Now 2 not null, but what 1 before.
So, the joke is that it should hide all output.
Eh it’s Javascript. Anything goes
Yeah, array.length is mutable in javascript. I’m surprised it caught on.
this is fucking gold
If i can just suppress the warnings which need to be fixed till morning in my buggy code, anything goes!
Actually fixing warnings is for noobs
if they mattered they’d be errors I’m sure
That’s when you do CTRL+C, CTRL+V
if (error) { continue; }try { operation(); } catch { // nice weather, eh? }☑️ PR Approved
Starting with Java 21 (I think), they’ve introduced ignored variables, so you can now actually do this:
try { operation(); } catch (Exception _) { // nice weather, eh? }Edit: forgot that this is about JS lel
Same thing right?
If your joking yes, if your not Java and Java Script are seperate things.
Actually made this mistake in front of 20 people the other day. Guy at my job mentioned coding in java and I asked if he was doing web dev 🤦
Plenty of java back end web development, so maybe not as embarrassing as you felt?
His joking?
So basically the same as a discard in C#?
Yeah, Python has it as well. I think the only real use of it is code readability since you declare that this variable will never be used.
Thanks. I hate it.
with contextlib.suppress(BaseException): do_thing()
On Error Resume NextVisual Basic is a beautiful language
On error goto 0Was always syntacticly confusing for me.
I don’t get it. This isn’t funny. I wouldn’t approve it in merge request. Most wouldn’t.
Trying to hide problems and incompetence is the joke. A lot of people don’t want problems solved, they just don’t want to see them, and will take the easy route. If you just want that, this is the easy route.
Incompetent? Absolutely, that’s the joke.
Meanwhile in another universe one of my biggest win was to introduce this line in our PR validation pipeline.
eslint . --max-warnings 0Works so well, and soothes the warning annoyance brain, and keeps warnings from eventually becoming errors.
In a codebase with a lot of warnings is even better for me to add a disable comments for all the existing warning and then not allow any new one in.
And then each time a part of the code needs to be touched the existing warning there should be solved too.
Several times I’ve set the max warnings to whatever the current warning count is, and then decreased that over time.
If it works, it works
Sometimes it’s better to hope while closing eyes
I would add: until it doesn’t.
This is why:
“It ain’t stupid if it works.”
is fundamentally incorrect.
-ErrorActionPreference SilentlyContinue
–yolo
If it wanted to get my attention it should have been an error
If I can’t see it, is it really there?
Warnings are for ignorings :3
Warnings? We’ll come back and address those later. Maybe once we’re feature complete. Or maybe shortly after that.
Don’t worry. We’ll totally fix all of them soon. Promise. Hand to God. They definitely will not be here five years from now.
edit: works better when used together with
StackOverflow.comment.enabled = false;
